Protocol for a Statewide Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Three Training Models for Implementing an Evidence-Based Treatment.

Journal Name
Implementation Science
Journal Volume
Journal Issue
Page Count
Year Published
Author (Individual)
Herschell, Amy D.
Kolko, David J.
Scudder, Ashley T.
Taber-Thomas, Sarah.
Schaffner, Kristen F.
Hiegel, Shelley A.
Iyengar, Satish.
Chaffin, Mark.
Mrozowski, Stanley.
Resource Type
Journal Article
Resource Format
Background: Evidence-based treatments (EBTs) are available for treating childhood behavioral health challenges. Despite EBTs’ potential to help children and families, they have primarily remained in university settings. Little empirical evidence exists regarding how specific, commonly used training and quality control models are effective in changing practice, achieving full implementation, and supporting positive client outcomes. Methods/design: This study (NIMH RO1 MH095750; Identifier: NCT02543359), which is currently in progress, will evaluate the effectiveness of three training models (Learning Collaborative (LC), Cascading Model (CM), and Distance Education (DE)) to implement a well-established EBT, Parent-Child Interaction Therapy, in real-world, community settings. The three models differ in their costs, skill training, quality control methods, and capacity to address broader implementation challenges. The project is guided by three specific aims: (1) to build knowledge about training outcomes, (2) to build knowledge about implementation outcomes, and (3) to test the differential impact of training clinicians using LC, CM, and DE models on key client outcomes. Fifty (50) licensed psychiatric clinics across Pennsylvania were randomized to one of the three training conditions: (1) LC, (2) CM, or (3) DE. The impact of training on practice skills (clinician level) and implementation/sustainment outcomes (clinic level) are being evaluated at four time points coinciding with the training schedule: baseline, 6 (mid), 12 (post), and 24 months (1 year follow-up). Immediately after training begins, parent–child dyads (client level) are recruited from the caseloads of participating clinicians. Client outcomes are being assessed at four time-points (pre-treatment, 1, 6, and 12 months after the pre-treatment). Discussion: This proposal builds on an ongoing initiative to implement an EBT statewide. A team of diverse stakeholders including state policy makers, payers, consumers, service providers, and academics from different, but complementary areas (e.g., public health, social work, psychiatry), has been assembled to guide the research plan by incorporating input from multidimensional perspective. (Author abstract)

Do you have something you think is appropriate for the library? Submit Library Resources.

bot icon
  • Current: Step 1/3
  • Step 2/3
  • Step 3/3
Was this page helpful